I realize that the court decision was just yesterday, but I think it is providing a lot more clarity for everybody, and I think that's been a good thing. As result of that, do you see any general operational changes with respect to requests that come in?
We have two issues here. One is a basic request that comes in to CBC. You're willing to comply. It's no issue. The Information Commissioner doesn't even get involved. She only gets involved when you refuse to provide information and the requester is not satisfied and then goes to the Information Commissioner. So you have two processes.
I would assume that for most of the vast majority of requests that come in, your department deals them, you get the information back to the requester, and life goes on. There are some, obviously, that you refuse, under either section 68.1 or other provisions. You refuse to provide the request, and then obviously the Information Commissioner gets involved if the requester wants further recourse.
Do you feel that your staffing level, your processes now, especially with what we've learned from both the first court case and the second, which I think has provided a lot more clarity, are ramped up so that your compliance rate will be much better than it's been in the past? Will your turnaround time be much better than it's been in the past? And do you believe that you won't use the rubber stamp of section 68.1 on all of these requests in the future, because you have a lot more clarity now?