If we find that we need to expand, I prefer that.
I'm uncomfortable about charting out now whether we're doing 50,000 feet or ground at this point. Whenever you get into a study, you need to see where you're going. We need to start out high, I think, because we need to see what the general lay of the land is, and whether there are lessons to be learned, and then we will go into the Lobbying Act. So I would be worried about prescribing it.
My question to Mr. Del Mastro is about this briefing in camera. I'm concerned about it, because if we're briefed about background and then we're doing our work at committee, if we've been told something in camera, then inadvertently we might end up damaging the committee because we say something based on what we were told. I just want to understand why he thinks it would be better to do in camera, rather than just do a briefing.