If the act was amended and it provided for these levels of violations or charges under the act for non-compliance or for doing something inappropriate, do you really think that your department internally is the right place to be the judge, jury, and executioner, for lack of a better way of putting it? I know that sounds a little harsh, but rather than you making a recommendation, perhaps having an independent third party, a tribunal or some other monitor that could look at all of the evidence that's being presented...?
One would assume the accused would want their day in court, so to speak, to say this is exactly what happened, this is the situation, rather than you—and I'm not questioning your judgment, or your staff, as I think you're all very professional people. But I am concerned about due process to some degree and people being falsely accused or falsely charged, or information not being fully accurate.
Would an independent body to which, other than the RCMP, you may refer a significant criminal charge to...? Would it not be helpful to have some independent tribunal that you could refer cases to, that they could properly adjudicate in a neutral, unbiased kind of way?