In terms of the group coming to see you, if they're all lobbying and communicating in the meeting, then I think their names should be on a list.
Are you asking if it's government initiated, if the meeting is transparent? Some of the things that come up—and I have an interpretation bulletin on government-initiated consultations—if they are transparent.... For example, appearances before the committee are quite transparent. Minutes of the meeting are being taken. Anyone can figure out who attended the meeting and what was said.
The issue with private meetings is this: are they now behind closed doors and should there be more information? Those individuals who are coming to see you would participate and communicate in the meeting and would then show up on the list.
This is the whole thing of getting out there. Lobbying is legitimate. It's just that it needs to be done in a transparent manner.