Yes. I'm still trying to get my head around that. One of the recommendations of the lobbying commissioner is that we remove this “significant part of duties”, this 20% rule, partly because there are people who have enormous influence if they make a phone call. That might be 5% of their duties, but they could have enormous influence because it's about who you know, and that's what makes their phone calls effective.
So we're worried about them falling under the radar, but I guess if an academic were coming to meet with you because of concern about prison policy, copyright policy, or health care policy, they would have to be signed up the same as you in the Capital Hill Group would be. Is that what you're suggesting?