I'm not suggesting the solution; I'm just pointing it out. But I would say, what would be the harm...? If the idea is that Canadians need to know who is trying to move the balance point in a policy--for whatever reason--why is the public good served by them knowing only what Joe Jordan is doing, but not knowing what person X, Y, or Z is doing, a person who is out there and having considerable influence?
I'm not saying it's easy, Mr. Angus. I'm just saying that if the goal is to throw light on everybody who's trying to get the government to do something, I think we're getting less than we could get by not including those other participants.