We have this amendment. We're going to vote on it. I'm just going to throw a suggestion out to test the floor, and if it's rejected, just nod your heads no.
We had a substantial conversation about one of these commissioners in particular in terms of access to information. Would it be of interest to the committee to have two hours with that commissioner and slot one hour for the others, to proceed that way, or should we just take the motion as it is?
Take the motion as it is. Okay.
So the amendment to the motion as it is right now is to have each of the commissioners appear before the committee for one hour each.
(Amendment agreed to)
Now to the main motion, which is to see each of these commissioners report to the committee for one hour each. We'll line them up as quickly as we can in the order we can get them. Can I just seek a vote on this motion? Do we need to have more discussion?
(Motion as amended agreed to)
I'm not sure if we have any other committee business that we need to conduct.
Just on the motion prior to this one, on the CBC and specific to access to information, we're going to need some witness suggestions from the members. Just so people have an understanding, it might not be as...we're going to get it as quickly as possible, but some of these folks are extraordinarily busy; some of them are in court. We'll get who we can, but we're going to need, as soon as possible, suggestions for witnesses from the members of the committee. That's fine; everybody understands.
I don't want to drag this out. Is tomorrow at four o'clock okay for people, or do you need more time than that? This is just for lists of witnesses.
Mr. Angus.