But right now you've got a five-year ban, which means the 20% threshold allows them to do some government communications as long as it's not the dominant part of what they're doing. If you leave the five-year rule in place and eliminate the 20% threshold, they would then be entirely out of the profession for a full five years. Is that correct?
I'm just trying to understand what it is you're recommending. You're not recommending to eliminate the 20% rule and replace it with x; you're just saying eliminate it, right?