Yes, I think there are cases where the name of the individual or their title could have the effect of divulging sensitive information. We give the example in our submission of two vice-presidents from two companies who both have responsibility for mergers and acquisitions and who go in and meet the competition commissioner at the same time. Somebody could look at that and, rightly or wrongly, conclude that those companies were about to merge. That could affect their stock prices.
We think there should be a process to determine what types of exemptions there should be, but off the top of my head, I think you should be able to go to the commissioner and say: “Look, this is our concern, and instead of reporting the meeting in 30 days, can we report it in 45, in 60...?” Disclose it, but it's the public reporting aspect that would, with the discretion of the commissioner, perhaps be delayed if it wouldn't be in the public interest to report it in that timeframe.