I want to continue with you on the issue of keeping it in-house. Our situation is that if the lobbying commissioner finds that someone has done something wrong, they have to suspend that investigation immediately and turn it over to the RCMP. We've had zero follow-up from the RCMP. This is not to suggest that the RCMP aren’t doing their job, but they have a whole different set of codes they work by and we've never had any follow-up.
Again, in the absence of administrative monetary penalties, it does seem to be a get-out-of-jail card. Do you think it's more effective for the lobbying commissioner to be able to carry out an investigation, do the work based on the principles of the parliamentary system, and then administer the penalty and issue the report?