Thank you, Madam Chair.
Thank you, witnesses, for being here today.
Under the current legislation we have a very broad definition of “designated public office holder”; it covers a whole bunch of people. In your view, is it enough? Is it too broad? Should it be more specific? Should fewer office holders be covered?
There is an argument that's made that some of us, because we're sitting on the back bench, perhaps don't have as much influence as a cabinet minister or a parliamentary secretary or people working in the Prime Minister's Office would have. Are you satisfied with the current definition of who is covered under the DPOH, or do you think it should be broader or narrower, from each of your perspectives?