It's funny how some things are regarded as silly, but when they put motions like this they are not very silly, so we'll take this very seriously.
We're talking about government resources, House of Commons resources. If you want to go down this road, let's talk about all government resources.
Quite often ministers' parliamentary staff, ministers' executive staff, are using tweets on an ongoing basis to promote their minister, and often they take on attacks on members of Parliament as well. Just recently I was attacked by a member of a minister's staff on Twitter, and I don't see myself getting my knickers all in a knot in regard to what he was saying. I found it quite interesting, though, and so did a lot of other people on Twitter, that he was doing it anonymously. He had not disclosed himself as a ministerial staffer out there contradicting and challenging a member of Parliament on Twitter.
When someone uses Twitter anonymously, as the motion says, we need to look at the broader problem and the broader scope, and why ministers' offices, often on directive, have guys sitting down at computers all day long putting out tweets on their minister and then turning their resources to attacking a member of Parliament over this.
If the government members want to go down this very serious road, we need to look in depth at how rampant this particular issue is.
Getting back to the amendment made by Mrs. Davidson a little while ago, to push this out another week--