Exactly. Public-private partnerships have an impact on privacy. Continuity must be established in the protection of privacy, and that continuity must be ensured through a strong and effective legislative framework.
In CATSA's case, that contract ensured that the agency's obligations with regard to privacy also applied to subcontractors. Therefore, this violation of privacy was non-compliant, and it violated the Privacy Act.
CATSA acknowledged the fact that it needed to improve its monitoring of contractors when it comes to privacy. Therefore, we expect improvements in the overseeing of contractors. Regarding your more general question, you are completely right. In our opinion, the public-private partnership phenomenon has very relevant repercussions on privacy protection, and we are monitoring the situation.