I'd just say if it was intended to be confidential, it's not. I'm sure most members read the story in the Globe and Mail this morning.
I don't see any reason why this should be held confidential either. We had hearings here that were entirely in public. We heard testimony that was entirely in public. I think secondly there were a number of questions that were either not answered or perhaps not answered fully.
I'm entirely supportive of what Mr. Angus is requesting. I would anticipate most members here at the committee would be.