It's pretty remarkably, actually. It demonstrates that there is a whole level of research and information being gathered that I don't think Canadians understand is being gathered. When the Privacy Commissioner talks about this currency that's being freely given away, and we talk about things like privacy settings and the default privacy settings that are going on, I don't think there's informed consent.
All of our witnesses today are professors of law who have a pretty good idea what it means when you read a disclaimer. Wouldn't it make sense if we started off with something that was very straightforward, and take the legalese out of it and say here's what you're signing up for, and if you don't want these things, click here? Wouldn't that be a good spot to start?
I'm interested in what you have to say about specifically informed consent. I think this idea of tracking is something that a lot of Canadians would find disturbing.