No, that's right, but you do have jurisdiction over the members of the party who would actually be directing this and making these calls, and of course those would be the people who then would be beholden to these large interests. We remember back in June, for example, when the NDP was filibustering back-to-work legislation, because the disruption at Canada Post was harming so many individuals and small businesses. We remember that the NDP was actually reading from materials that were provided directly by CUPW and in fact wearing CUPW paraphernalia into the House. Is that not an indication that perhaps they might be beholden to some special interests?
On September 29th, 2011. See this statement in context.