I don't think it's primarily a budgetary issue. We'd have the same amount of work either way. The only thing is it might be a little clearer. There would be slight differences. I have to table two reports, but I'm increasingly duplicating significant sections in each of the reports. Each year I try to make it a little bit simpler.
Similarly, from time to time I've had investigations under the act and the code at the same time. I tried to put them in one report this last time, so I'm gradually trying to deal with that problem.
The real issue is that the rules are slightly different. It would be nice to just take a look to see whether they need to be slightly different.