Yes, Mr. Angus. Thank you for recognizing that point.
I tried to make that an integral part of the final portion of my presentation. The reason I did that is this. If we develop laws or we call on the Privacy Commissioner to enforce very real consequences, if the user has agreed and displaced the laws of the local forum for, as you would say, Somalia, what do you do when that comes before the courts? Or what happens when the Privacy Commissioner goes to actually enforce that judgment in a jurisdiction that doesn't have the reciprocal enforcements of what she is trying to declare as against that social media outlet?
I had put my mind to that briefly. I had thought it should be set up perhaps by way of legislation that could contain definitions as to what a social media company is. Also, social media companies that conduct business within the jurisdiction are clearly governed by the laws of Canada. You could have a voluntary method by which the large key players would voluntarily submit to be governed by that legislation if something like that is forthcoming.
I'm not sure if the appetite exists for that, but I guess there are different ways we could potentially analyze that issue.