Yes, I do.
First of all, the privacy commissioner performs an essential role. There is the question as to whether you would give more powers to the privacy commissioner or you would lead to a hybrid sort of judicial model where you're describing different statutes and codifications that would give more power to enforce litigation.
Part of the theory seems to be that when a company receives bad publicity—shall we say, the changes that were enacted by Facebook in 2009—consumers at that point proceed to vote with their feet and the company doesn't want to be seen in that particular light. But as we've heard from Mr. Péladeau, it becomes a social norm to be part of Facebook. It becomes a social norm to be part of these other social media sites, so people still return even though they realize there have been affronts to their rights, which can occur.
Perhaps you could also look at developing a hybrid model by which you could have the cooperation of businesses and different companies within the social media sphere with whom you could work to jointly develop those same laws and regulations, which could then be utilized for the protection of all Canadians and their privacy.