The choice of jurisdiction clause is something that should be boiled down to simply saying that [Technical difficulty--Editor] afforded to you in Canada may not exist should you choose to enter into the service.
Facebook at one point was criticized, as our earlier witness stated, for having terms of service that were as long, if not longer, than the Declaration of Independence.
I think that key primary points should be addressed. If a pop-up occurs in a window, the key primary points as to how that will affect the user in very short language should at least inform the first part of that pop-up. A lot of times what happens is that the entirety of the terms and service changes are reproduced within that pop-up window, and the “accept” button is featured when the pop-up window occurs. You can click “accept” without necessarily scrolling down through the multitude of terms and changes to the conditions that occur. I know that there was technology employed at one point that required the user at least to scroll down to say that they had looked through the terms—they'd had a cursory glance—before they could click accept.
I do think that simplification exists.