It looks a bit like the U.K. model where they have a registrar of some sort, and it's very bureaucratic. I'm not sure that this is the right way to go. But if there are standards of transparency and openness such that if you are in the market you must provide this or that information and make it available, that would make more sense. If the issue is to create a registrar, that's costly and you might not be covering everything. But if you have a clear obligation to be open and transparent, in the work we did in the “L'identité piratée” report in 1986, that was the model we preferred.
On October 16th, 2012. See this statement in context.