Both. I think it's probably the latest chunk and the reason the timeframe is April and not December.
There are a couple of issues. One of them is the technical definition of what needs to be deleted—for example, a posting in a forum that another person started, so one person starts a thread and somebody else contributes to that thread and then that person leaves. It's both technically challenging and really without precedent anywhere else on the web for that whole thread to disappear. So that person's comments....
For example, if you go to a newspaper site today and you comment on a story and then you decide that you no longer want to be a member on that newspaper site, or whatever it might be, they don't delete your comments in those threads in any one that I've come across.
So I think to some degree there wasn't an engagement with the definition of what the owners were supposed to delete.
The second challenge is this. Nexopia has had a long track record of cooperating with law enforcement authorities on different investigations and didn't want to compromise that. Again, it's hard for me to speak on behalf of the previous owners, but there were a number of reasons—some voiced in those recommendations and findings and some voiced privately—that caused them not to move.
The technical part of deleting older data is less challenging than defining what exactly they were supposed to delete.