Thank you for the question. I think it's an important one and I appreciate that the committee is taking the time to think through that issue, which is a critical one. You mentioned enforcement regimes in the U.S. and Europe in comparison to Canada's, and as you point out, they're very different.
I think when you look at each of those regimes, although they're different, they've all been effective. As you know, we're based in Menlo Park, California, but we have a robust relationship with the Privacy Commissioner's office. I think that's a reflection of the fact that the existing regime works quite well. We're able to have consultations with her office in a way that's productive, enables us to get to good results, and allows us to make decisions that are best for Canadians. That is not adversarial in the way that you might see if the regime were different.
So I think we're actually quite a good example of how the Privacy Commissioner has used her authority well, has created robust privacy change, and has improved the service that we provide based on our existing authority.