As I mentioned in my opening remarks, the test is whether it's a contribution under the act of no more than $1,100. Any amount above that would be prohibited; it would be illegal. I also should point out that the legislation does not put any prohibition on parties conducting business transactions—I mentioned a few examples earlier—so it leaves us to the general schema of the act, especially the provision that prevents circumventing the limit on contributions.
In the case at hand, again, for us it's not a matter of whether the transaction achieved undue influence; it's whether the transaction was above the limit of $1,100 per the individual who is contributing.