There are two thoughts on that. You've expressed one, that it's too political, that it's best to get it out of the political realm. I understand that view. I think the other argument, though, and it's what I would I say about the code for the members of the House, is that it's about taking responsibility, too. You encourage people to take responsibility.
If you see the Conflict of Interest Act as an educative tool, and you believe members and the Prime Minister and the cabinet ministers and all public office holders should take responsibility, then it's up to us to encourage a de-political approach to this.
I realize there's a certain level of idealism in that, but it seems to me you go one way or the other. If you're contemplating creating an ethics commission as opposed to having an ethics ombudsman who investigates and reports, you have to create a very different structure here. All I can say quickly is that you'll need to look at the models that exist in the United States, where you have essentially ethics tribunals. You will create a very, very different system that may not have the same value from an educational point of view, that may become cumbersome from an expense point of view, and so on. There's a lot to look at there if you go that route.
The other thing—