That's very interesting. Certainly, the concerned public has a desire to find out if rules were broken, and we are all accountable to the public at the end of the day. Would you be in a position then to report that you had x number of cases initiated by the public, that some were not in your jurisdiction—just so that people know—or for some you didn't have enough evidence?
Under Scottish law there is guilty, innocent, and there is not proven. Sometimes not having any evidence provided might warrant a statement. Do you feel that you should put that out?