You'll view it with the evidence that you have on a case-by-case scenario. We as members of Parliament may see things differently, or the public may see things differently from either your office or ours. I'm wondering how we can protect, without outlining every scenario, and whether in fact we shouldn't have guidelines that are more hard and fast. The review of conflict of interest is somewhat subjective, I guess, varying from one person to another, and it presents a complex position. I'm wondering how we might be able to better serve all offices by having more clarity and more assurance.
