Thank you, Chairperson.
Thank you to Ms. Dawson and her staff for coming today.
I have a couple of questions. First of all, obviously to do this review is very important.
As a bit of a comment, I think one of the most important criteria is to have rules that are strong and clear and well understood, and the less ambiguity the better. You've talked a bit about the discretion you have. I don't know how many cases you've dealt with overall, but you must have a general sense of how MPs, public officer holders, and even how the public view this process.
Would you say there is a good understanding of what the process is about, say, by public office holders and MPs? Do we understand it properly?