There is a balance. Certainly I'm very conscious of protecting people's reputations when they shouldn't be attacked needlessly.
I've had several cases, for example, where an MP has gone out and said they had taken something to the Ethics Commissioner and she said it was just fine, and I haven't. I think it should be within my power to say “No, I did not say that.”
I'm not even sure that the act as it stands right now doesn't allow me to make some public comment. The provision in the act is restricted to once an examination has begun, but there's a general philosophy in the act that I keep things confidential, and also in the Parliament of Canada Act.
So all I'm really suggesting is that there be some kind of a provision to make it clear that I can cover off misleading information.