I actually saw that as kind of a useful suggestion, yes, not necessarily to change the act, but I'm asking myself whether there's not a little bit more in that line that I could put in my annual reports.
Again, it's a balance between protecting somebody's reputation being impugned unnecessarily, so of course one would have to not mention the individual. Sometimes the situations are notorious, or are in the media, so just saying what it was about, somebody would know which case it was.
One has to be quite careful in that area, but I'm thinking about it.