First of all, just to avoid confusion, the expression “designated public office holder” comes from the Lobbying Act, not from my act.
I think the appropriate people are covered by the act. The members, of course, are covered by a separate piece, a separate code. Those rules are there, so I don't think there's a gap there.
I have suggested that maybe the two should be looked at together to see whether there's anything that could be harmonized, because it's easier for people to understand rules if they're not different all over the place.
I don't know if that answers your question, but I think it's not bad.