Nobody is caught by “ministerial adviser”. I never hear about any. There aren't any. So I'm saying there is something wrong with that being in the act.
What I'm suggesting there is.... I'm sure there are a number of advisers who don't occupy a position in an office. That thing is what makes it so that we're not getting any information on advisers. That's the thrust of that recommendation. Something tells me there is something wrong if we don't have any ministerial advisers under the current definition.