Well, they're already covered under the provincial legislation, apparently, with the conflict rules.
What I've said there is that it looks like that was an anomaly in the amendment. There was a change. The code or guidelines or something was accepted under the original legislation. When the act came in, I think, it just didn't happen to technically fit the description of what was exempted. I don't care if they're exempted or not, but I think it was inadvertent that they weren't. We don't apply it to them now.