Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Welcome to our panellists today.
Carrying on with the conversation about your recommendations regarding 6-2, 6-3, and 6-4, you were just speaking about a member refraining from commenting publicly on an investigation and your allowing a preliminary view of requests and so on.
It's a two-way street. Obviously part of the communication is letting people know that there's an investigation ongoing, and you can't do that unless you go public. How do you square that circle? It's often charged in the media or elsewhere, and if neither party is commenting on it, then it just goes up into a vacuum. Do you see that as being a problem?