One of the witnesses we had before talked about clear rules, and Mr. Angus talked about fair rules. Fair and clear sometimes are not necessarily the same.
As far as clear rules go, do you think we would have the ability to put in place rules that were clear enough to cover all the bases? Are we not better off to be in some ways a little more general? I like the idea that as long as there's a real or apparent interest that is maybe connected to a financial gain of some sort.... What is your feeling about trying to identify all the areas of conflict of interest?