If I understand your question correctly, and correct me if I'm wrong, I can only take complaints from members about another member. If in fact a member releases that information publicly before I even receive it, is that political? Even before the party who's being complained about gets a copy of it? Is that political? I would suggest it could be.
I have nothing in my act that would restrict a member from releasing this information. However, my predecessors have made it quite clear in the past that they don't look favourably upon this information being tried in the public domain while we're trying to investigate and prepare a report.
To be honest, I think that many of these complaints are politically oriented. Many of them are legitimate and have good grounds for an investigation. It's just part of the job that politics enters into it. Certainly in my act, if I find it's a frivolous complaint, I can say so in my report. I don't know if that helps balance it out or not. I've never had to do that.