Sure, that's fine. So is everybody else in the broadcasting business. They're making enough money to pay for their own operations.
I think the frustrating thing for Canadians in this particular case is that there doesn't seem to be a clear enough dispute mechanism here to resolve questions of section 68.1 in the act so that it actually has to get the commissioner involved and a judge involved.
The other part that's really frustrating in this—and nobody seems to have commented on this--is we have a taxpayer-funded organization using taxpayers' funds to put up a defence versus a taxpayer-funded office of the commissioner of access to information, fighting each other in a court paid for by the taxpayers of Canada. I'm wondering if you could provide any clarification of what needs to happen here. This isn't in the best interests of taxpayers, clearly, unless we get to an endgame where we get the transparency we're looking for.