He's subject to a two-year period. Okay.
So within that two-year period, then, your recommendations 5-6 and 5-7 in your book, on page 57, read:
That the Act be amended to require former reporting public office holders to report any firm offers of a contract of service, an appointment to a board of directors, a partnership relationship or employment during the cooling-off period, within seven days of the offer.
Then 5-7 carries on,
That the Act be amended to require former reporting public office holders to report on their duties and responsibilities in relation to their new contracts of service, appointments to a board of directors, partnership relationships or employment during the cooling-off period, including a description of their duties and responsibilities and information on any measures taken to ensure compliance with the Act.
Are you satisfied that within the cooling-off period—and we have a two-year cooling-off period that is the most stringent of the cooling-off periods—that you can manage that disclosure, that this disclosure will be as transparent as you are expecting from this and that you will be able to manage it?
You know where I'm going with this.