Yes, thank you.
I have a very quick question. The crux of the problem here that's facing the folks in the court battles is that the CBC is determining whether section 68.1 applies, not the Information Commissioner. This is not the way it's supposed to work. Regardless of how the wording is put in the act, the act clearly stipulates that it's the Information Commissioner who is supposed to apply the principles of section 68.1.
I have a second question for the CRTC. The CBC ombudsman reports back to the CBC, not the CRTC. Do you think that's appropriate? Should we be taking a look at that and determining whether the ombudsman should be reporting back to the CRTC as the regulator, instead of directly back to the CBC?