Thank you, Mr. Chair.
First of all, I want to thank all of the witnesses for being here this afternoon, especially in light of the importance of the issues raised in this bill.
I will begin with a comment, if I may. Given his reactions, I think that the sponsor of this bill is being quite candid and does not realize the scope of the consequences of his bill. I invite him to consider that aspect, since, clearly, some very eminent experts have come here to warn us about the risks inherent in his bill.
My first question is addressed to Mr. Myles and Mr. Robillard.
You explained the great importance of investigative journalism very eloquently. Do you think that an amendment to protect sources could allow certain programs like journalist Alain Gravel's Enquête, on the Charbonneau Commission, to continue to be as significant and productive? Do you think that even with an amendment designed to protect sources, journalists could continue to generate that high quality of information?