I think journalistic sources need to be protected. I think Parliament is supreme in the land. I've heard from other stakeholders that perhaps a judge would be more appropriate in reviewing such information. But I believe the Information Commissioner is better placed within the supremacy of Parliament to review this information. She stated earlier that she wouldn't be releasing this information; it would only be within the scope of investigation.
I note that previous stakeholders of the CBC, when asked if any access to information requests had been made on journalistic sources, replied that none had been made. I think that any reasonable person would be able to see on the face of it what a request constitutes: information on the administrative capacities of the CBC versus the outing of a journalistic source. I know that any such information would be excluded, as stated by the Information Commissioner, in such a release. It would be blacked out on those documents.