There may have been some misunderstanding on this subject. When I called amendment NDP-2, which concerns clause 4, I read the amendment myself. Normally it is the member who moves it who should read it. It was at that point that you could have read it and perhaps explained it. However, since I read it and you did not indicate at the outset that you wanted to read it or explain it, I informed the committee of my decision immediately after reading the amendment.
On June 5th, 2013. See this statement in context.