As I listen to your responses to the questions from the other side, I appreciate that your intent is probably similar to the intent of both sides, and that is to get to the root of the problem and to fix it. It appears to me that with the CBC right now, we're living in a do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do world, where, from my perspective and from everything I'm reading, they simply are thumbing their nose, not only at the Information Commissioner, who is appointed by this House, but also the courts of the land, which I find particularly obnoxious. I too, as you've stated, rely on the CBC for much of the news, and a lot of the information they provide is good information. So when I see that, it's a total conflict of values to my sense.
You've also addressed section 68.1. The CBC's treatment of that section is a blatant and ill-disguised exercise, which is probably an issue that is them again thumbing their nose at the laws as they exist and the rules as they're established. In Justice Boivin's summary...and we heard from the CRTC CEO, Mr. von Finckenstein, the other day talking about section 68.1 as being poorly drafted. It appears from what I'm hearing in your testimony that there are ways in which we can fix this.
Do you have some specific thoughts of how we can fix section 68.1 so that it applies fairly to everybody?