Thank you, Mr. Angus.
I don't see a point of order in there, but just to focus the debate somewhat more, we should be aware that the motion we're debating calls for a study into whether government initiatives include proper protocols for the duty to document, etc. It's a more broad-reaching examination, I think, that's being asked for, about whether the policy and the protocols actually conflict with the law, with the requirements under the Access to Information Act.
I don't see any accusations of criminal activity directly in that, but both parties seem to be extrapolating a further meaning maybe than actually exists.
You still have the floor, Mr. Calandra.