It's safe to say that your goal with the legislation isn't to investigate current partisans within particular agencies. It's not outing anybody for being a particular partisan. The goal is, obviously, moving forward to help ensure that these agencies continue to work in the fashion that at least I believe they are right now, a non-partisan fashion. This just adds to that level of accountability.
I asked that only because I think Mr. Angus wasn't quite understanding the purpose of the bill. He seems to be looking for a retroactivity in this, trying to get you to out people who might be partisan. That's not what this is about, I'm assuming. This is about moving forward and adding another layer of accountability. Am I correct on that?