All right. That is good to know. I did not know that.
So going back to what I was saying, I believe that if Mr. Adler had examined the act at the start, we could probably have avoided a lot of confusion. Some of my Conservative colleagues probably share that view given the changes they have made.
When we consider the amendments, we will see whether the members of the government party support an opposition amendment. If I had to advance arguments as to which amendment is most essential to support, I think it would probably be this one, but I may be somewhat biased since I introduced this amendment myself. The fact remains that, if we do not examine the definition of what is partisan in this bill, I believe the bill will fail in its scope.
I will stop there. I think I have said enough about the importance of defining partisanship and of systematically linking this question, which appears in the bill, to the Public Service Employment Act.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.