Is there any further debate on the point of order before I rule on it?
Mr. Calandra, you noted when I opened this meeting that we're here pursuant to Standing Order 111.1(1). You're quoting 111.1(2). Under 111.1(1) it says, from O'Brien and Bosc on page 1,014:
...the Standing Orders do not impose specific limits on the scope of the examination when a proposed candidate appears before the committee or on the number of sitting days that may be devoted to the appearance.
I think you're quoting from the wrong standing order, sir, so you don't have a point of order.
Mr. Angus.