There is no doubt, sir, that you are doing a great job with the money you have. My question is that perhaps you are doing what any good civil servant at your level would do, you deal with the budget you have but that doesn't mean you have enough. That doesn't mean you couldn't have more, particularly in a changing climate.
Privacy in this country and in the world has fundamentally changed in its nature and there needs to be proper government investment with regard to the future.
Anyway, that's a comment.
What I find kind of funny in this climate too is that we actually rip $125,000 from your budget to go and give it to the CRTC to deal with spam mail. Why did we take that from your budget? Can you explain why we took that from your budget to give it to the CRTC instead of raising the CRTC's budget to deal with the issue?