Essentially what we're saying here, or what the other side is saying here, is that for something as fundamental as a quasi-constitutional right, we can't work in our budget the necessary resources for you to ensure a healthy democracy, and that somehow we're going to pick that up with user fees. It seems to me bizarre to have to pay for a quasi-constitutional right. But that's my comment. You've commented quite a bit on this issue.
I'm concerned about this letter that you've prepared in order to get more resources. There seems to be a lack of clarity as to where this letter has to go. Where does that lack of clarity come from?