Thank you, Ms. Borg.
Before we go to Mr. Calandra, we should be aware, so we can inform the debate, that the second aspect of Mr. Angus's motion is problematic. It would require the House to concur in a report of this committee.
If this committee did approve the motion today, it would create a report to the House. The House would have to concur with that report, and then invite the Senate Ethics Officer.
It's completely in order, though, to invite the President of the Treasury Board to appear to defend his supplementary estimates (B), although the first question that comes to mind is, how does he possibly think that $60,000 would be enough to investigate the ethics in the Senate of Canada? That would be a logical question to put to him.